Assignment Goal: For this assignment students will create an argument
that identifies what "morals," if any, the rioters share in the texts
and videos we discuss until the assignment comes due, as well as what
"morals," if any, are conveyed by the authorities present in those texts
(by authorities, I refer to the persons and parties opposed to the
rioters). In their argument and claims, students will discuss the
significance of those morals.
Note: If students
cannot detect any overlapping 'morals' among the rioters, they may
consider what cluster of morals are evident in the texts/rioters
separately, or they may focus on any common strategies the rioters
employed as they rioted, and why those strategies are significant.
Assignment
Description: Structurally, this assignment follows the standard ENG 101
thesis-driven essay form: an introduction and thesis backed up with
supporting claims, textual evidence that's interpreted, and a
conclusion. For more details about this structure, click HERE. Also, see the "They Say / I Say" text on the right-hand side of this page.
In
terms of content, this assignment asks students to consider the riots
they read and watch in class texts and consider both 'the moral economy
of the crowd' (which we'll discuss more as the semester continues) and
the 'moral authority' of those persons and parties opposing crowds,
rioters, and protesters. Intellectually, our task is to see the
perspectives of both rioters and authorities and to convey, in our own
words, what they believed to be the larger ideas, or values, that
justified their actions. In your conclusion, but only in your
conclusion, you may venture to state what side, if any, you would take in the conflict or conflicts you've read and written about.
Please see the WIKI page for "moral economy," linked HERE,
although I don't recommend you cite it directly in any future blog or
essay. You may seek out the sources referenced in it, however, for this
essay, although I will be providing in-class definitions and terms you
may use as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment